EU AI Act · Regulation 2024/1689

EU AI Act Compliance
Ship Compliant Before August 2026

EU AI Act enforcement begins August 2026. These production-grade tools address key requirements—record-keeping, PII detection, data governance—at a fraction of enterprise compliance costs.

Timeline: Prohibited practices enforced since Feb 2025. General-purpose AI obligations since Aug 2025. Full high-risk AI system obligations apply 2 August 2026. Technical compliance infrastructure takes months to implement and validate.

EU AI Act articles mapped to production tools

Each tool addresses specific technical requirements described in the EU AI Act. Not legal advice—technical building blocks you can audit, test, and deploy.

Requirement What It Means Tool
Article 12
Record-keeping
AI systems must keep logs of operation for traceability. Logs must be immutable, time-stamped, and retained for the system’s expected lifetime or regulatory minimum. WORM Archive $99
S3 Object Lock COMPLIANCE mode, KMS encryption, 7-year retention, tamper-proof spool
Article 10
Data Governance
Training and input data must be relevant, representative, and free of errors. Data quality criteria must be defined and monitored. LLM Quality Monitor $39
16 workload-specific scorers, two-layer evaluation, programmatic + LLM-as-judge
Article 9
Risk Management
An ongoing risk management system is required for high-risk AI. Risks must be identified, assessed, and mitigated throughout the system’s lifecycle. Agent Framework $49
Trust gating prevents repeat failures, outcome history tracks risk over time
Article 13
Transparency
Users must be informed they are interacting with AI. Outputs must be interpretable. Technical documentation must be maintained. Claude Code Kit $29
PII scanner, AI code review gate, pre-commit hooks enforce documentation standards
Article 14
Human Oversight
AI systems must allow effective human intervention and oversight. Humans must be able to understand, monitor, and override AI decisions. Agent Framework $49
Supervised dispatch, approval gates, outcome history, manual override at every step

References: EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689), Articles 9, 10, 12, 13, 14. Full text available at EUR-Lex.

Why one-time purchase beats SaaS for compliance

Compliance requires auditability, control, and long-term access. SaaS subscriptions create the opposite.

Fully Auditable Source Code

Regulators and auditors can inspect exactly what your compliance infrastructure does. No black boxes. Every line of code is yours to review, modify, and present during audits.

No Vendor Lock-in

If a SaaS provider changes pricing, pivots their product, or shuts down, your compliance infrastructure disappears with them. Owning the code means your compliance posture is independent of any vendor’s business decisions.

No Recurring Fees

Compliance is a permanent obligation. Enterprise SaaS compliance tools cost $500–$5,000/month. One-time purchase means predictable cost, no budget surprises, and no renewal negotiations when you’re mid-audit.

Data Stays On Your Infrastructure

No compliance-sensitive data leaving your perimeter. WORM Archive writes to your S3 buckets. Quality Monitor runs in your process. Agent Framework logs to your database. Zero external data transmission.

Get the compliance infrastructure

One-time purchase. Full source code. 12 months of updates. 30-day refund policy.

Compliance Essentials

WORM Archive + Claude Code Kit

Immutable record-keeping (Article 12) plus PII detection and code review gates (Article 13). The two most commonly cited compliance requirements covered.

  • WORM Archive — S3 Object Lock, 7-year retention
  • Claude Code Kit — PII scanner, pre-commit hooks
  • Full source code + test suites
  • 12 months updates
$39
$128
Get Compliance Essentials

All prices are one-time purchases in USD. Personal tier (single developer). Commercial and Agency tiers available on each product page.

Compliance questions

No. These are technical building blocks that address specific requirements described in the EU AI Act. They do not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified legal professional for compliance guidance specific to your AI system’s risk classification and deployment context.
No. Compliance depends on your specific AI system, its risk classification, how you deploy it, and how you integrate these tools into your broader compliance framework. These tools provide the technical infrastructure that compliance requires—immutable logging, quality monitoring, human oversight mechanisms—but compliance is a process, not a product.
The tools are designed with the EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) as the primary framework. The WORM Archive also addresses GDPR record-keeping requirements and general regulatory retention obligations. The underlying patterns—immutable logging, data quality checks, human oversight—are broadly applicable to AI governance frameworks in other jurisdictions including the US NIST AI RMF and the UK’s pro-innovation AI framework.
The EU AI Act entered into force on 1 August 2024. Prohibited AI practices have applied since 2 February 2025. General-purpose AI model obligations have applied since 2 August 2025. The full set of obligations for high-risk AI systems applies from 2 August 2026. If you deploy AI systems in or affecting the EU market, August 2026 is the deadline to have technical compliance measures in place.